This UK-centric process is not for the faint-hearted or those looking for a quick-fix. If you not in default but have gleaned sufficient knowledge to know that you have been duped, conned and/or misled, then you might consider taking the following course of action against your mortgage bandit, whose entire modus operandi is to get you into default as quickly as possible, in order to take your home by using various statutes as a cloak for fraud.
______________________________________________________________________
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
ROBIN HOODY (CEO)
ROBIN HOODIES LIMITED
REGISTERED OFFICE
DATE
NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE
NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT
Dear ROBIN HOODIES,
Re: Mortgage Bandits Account Number ################
I hereby serve notice that I conditionally accept the alleged debt and will use my very best endeavours to settle and close the account in the most expedient manner possible, upon receipt of copies of the following items:
1. The original mortgage contract, signed by both parties and including all the individually negotiated terms and conditions, as per section 2 of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989.
2. All bookkeeping entries associated with the alleged loan,.
3. The original mortgage deed associated with the alleged loan, which must comply with section 1 of the 1989 Act.
4. The insurance policy on the borrowers’ note associated with the alleged loan.
5. The call reports for the period covering the alleged loan.
6. The deposit slip for the deposit of the borrower’s note associated with the alleged loan.
7. The order authorising the withdrawal of funds from borrower’s note deposit account.
8. The account number from which the money came to fund the alleged loan to the borrower.
9. Any allonge, front and back, affixed to the borrower’s note for endorsements.
10. Verification that the borrower’s note was a free gift to the alleged lender from the alleged borrower.
11. The name and mailing location of the current holder of the borrower’s note.
12. The name and mailing location of the lender’s chartered accountant and auditor for the period covering the alleged loan.
Please deliver these reasonably requested items within 7 days of your receipt of this notice at the mailing location provided herein. Failure to do so will comprise the tacit procuration of your agreement that your company is unable to verify and validate the alleged loan, which may result in the initiation of a commercial injury claim to cure the injury done to NAME OF MORTGAGOR.
With sincerity and honour,
By: Upper-Case:Lower
Authorised Representative for NAME OF MORTGAGOR
All Rights Reserved – Without Prejudice – Without Recourse – Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted – Strictly no rights of Usufruct
______________________________________________________________________
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
ROBIN HOODY (CEO)
ROBIN HOODIES LIMITED
REGISTERED OFFICE
DATE
NOTICE OF DISHONOUR & OPPORTUNITY TO CURE
NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT
Dear ROBIN HOODIES,
Re: Mortgage Bandits Account Number ################
Following your company’s dishonour of the NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE dated ______________, I hereby serve NOTICE OF DISHONOUR & OPPORTUNITY TO CURE. Therefore, please provide me with the following items without delay:
1. The original mortgage contract, signed by both parties and including all the individually negotiated terms and conditions, as per section 2 of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989.
2. All bookkeeping entries associated with the alleged loan,.
3. The original mortgage deed associated with the alleged loan, which must comply with section 1 of the 1989 Act.
4. The insurance policy on the borrowers’ note associated with the alleged loan.
5. The call reports for the period covering the alleged loan.
6. The deposit slip for the deposit of the borrower’s note associated with the alleged loan.
7. The order authorising the withdrawal of funds from borrower’s note deposit account.
8. The account number from which the money came to fund the alleged loan to the borrower.
9. Any allonge, front and back, affixed to the borrower’s note for endorsements.
10. Verification that the borrower’s note was a free gift to the alleged lender from the alleged borrower.
11. The name and mailing location of the current holder of the borrower’s note.
12. The name and mailing location of the lender’s chartered accountant and auditor for the period covering the alleged loan.
Failure to deliver these reasonably requested items within 7 days of your receipt of this notice at the mailing location provided herein will comprise the tacit procuration of your agreement that your company is unable to verify and validate the alleged loan, and in so doing, your company may be in breach of the Fraud Act 2006, which clearly states:
3 Fraud by failing to disclose information
A person is in breach of this section if he—
(a) dishonestly fails to disclose to another person information which he is under a legal duty to disclose, and
(b) intends, by failing to disclose the information—
(i) to make a gain for himself or another, or
(ii) to cause loss to another or to expose another to a risk of loss.
In the event that this notice is dishonoured and it is established by the facts of the matter that your company has committed fraud, please take notice that NAME OF MORTGAGOR will begin any and all administrative and/or judicial proceedings deemed necessary, in order to recover three times the value of your company’s invalid claim in damages, plus the principal allegedly owed.
With sincerity and honour,
By: Upper-Case:Lower
Authorised Representative for NAME OF MORTGAGOR
All Rights Reserved – Without Prejudice – Without Recourse – Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted – Strictly no rights of Usufruct
______________________________________________________________________
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
ROBIN HOODY (CEO)
ROBIN HOODIES LIMITED
REGISTERED OFFICE
DATE
NOTICE OF DISHONOUR
Notice to the principal is notice to the agent
Notice to the agent is notice to the principal
Dear ROBIN HOODIES,
Re: Mortgage Bandits Account Number ################
Following your company’s dishonour of the NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE dated ______________ and the NOTICE OF DISHONOUR & OPPORTUNITY TO CURE dated ____________, I hereby serve NOTICE OF DISHONOUR.
For the avoidance of doubt, pursuant to the terms set forth in the aforementioned notices, ROBIN HOODIES and NAME OF MORTGAGOR are now in agreement that:
1. There is no valid and enforceable mortgage contract in existence.
2. All bookkeeping entries associated with the alleged loan are being concealed by ROBIN HOODIES.
3. There is no valid and enforceable mortgage deed or charge operating as a deed in existence.
4. The insurance policy on the alleged borrower’s note is being concealed by ROBIN HOODIES.
5. The call reports for the period covering the alleged loan are being concealed by ROBIN HOODIES.
6. The deposit slip for the deposit of the alleged borrower’s note is being concealed by ROBIN HOODIES.
7. The order authorising the withdrawal of funds from the alleged borrower’s note deposit account is being concealed by ROBIN HOODIES.
8. The account number from which the money came to fund the alleged loan is being concealed by ROBIN HOODIES.
9. Any existing allonge, front and back, affixed to the promissory note for endorsements, are being concealed by ROBIN HOODIES.
10. Verification that the note was a free gift to the alleged lender from the alleged borrower does not exist.
11. The name and mailing location of the current holder of the note are being concealed by ROBIN HOODIES.
12. The name and mailing location of the alleged lender’s chartered accountant and auditor for the period covering the aqlleged loan are being concealed by ROBIN HOODIES.
With sincerity and honour,
By: Upper-Case:Lower
Authorised Representative for NAME OF MORTGAGOR
All Rights Reserved – Without Prejudice – Without Recourse – Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted
____________________________________________________________________
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
ROBIN HOODY (CEO)
ROBIN HOODIES LIMITED
REGISTERED OFFICE
DATE
NOTICE REQUESTING ADEQUATE ASSURANCE OF DUE PERFORMANCE
NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT
Dear ROBIN HOODIES,
Re: Mortgage Bandits Account Number ################
It has come to my attention that there is every reason to believe that ROBIN HOODIES may be in breach of the statutory law of mortgages.
Therefore, I am hereby serving notice of my intention to discharge the alleged debt in full, provided that I receive specific answers to the following questions:
1. According to the alleged loan agreement, did ROBIN HOODIES lend its own money as adequate consideration to purchase the note (loan agreement) from STRAWMAN [Name of Mortgagor]? Please answer YES or NO.
2. According to the relevant bookkeeping entries, did ROBIN HOODIES lend its own money as adequate consideration to purchase the note (loan agreement) from STRAWMAN? Please answer YES or NO.
3. According to the alleged loan agreement, was STRAWMAN to provide valuable consideration to fund the alleged loan? Please answer YES or NO.
4. According to the relevant bookkeeping entries, did ROBIN HOODIES accept anything of value from STRAWMAN that was used to give value to a cheque or similar instrument of approximately the same value of the alleged loan? Please answer YES or NO.
5. Did ROBIN HOODIES follow UK GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles of the United Kingdom) in the execution of the alleged loan agreement? Please answer YES or NO.
6. Can ROBIN HOODIES provide evidence that its accountant and auditor at the time of the execution of the alleged loan confirmed that it followed GAAP in the execution of the alleged loan? Please answer YES or NO.
7. Was it the intent of the alleged loan agreement that the party who funded the loan is the party that is to be repaid the money? Please answer YES or NO.
8. Are all the material facts of the alleged loan disclosed in the original (alleged) agreement? Please answer YES or NO.
9. According to the alleged loan agreement, was STRAWMAN obliged to lend the note to ROBIN HOODIES or another financial institution in order to fund the alleged loan? Please answer YES or NO.
10. Are the economics of the alleged loan similar to stealing, counterfeiting and swindling against STRAWMAN? Please answer YES or NO. (this one is definitely not for the fainthearted!)
Failure to answer these reasonable questions with specific answers within seven (7) days of your receipt of this notice, will comprise the tacit procuration of ROBIN HOODIES’ agreement that it has concealed material facts from STRAWMAN, that the purported mortgage note has been sold, altered or stolen, and that the alleged borrower provided the funds that the alleged lender claims were lent to STRAMMAN, in which case, STRAWMAN is legally entitled to file a commercial injury claim for at least three times the value of the alleged loan, plus the principal allegedly owed.
With sincerity and honour,
By: Upper-Case:Lower
Authorised Representative for STRAWMAN
All Rights Reserved – Without Prejudice – Without Recourse – Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted
_____________________________________________________________________
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
ROBIN HOODY (CEO)
ROBIN HOODIES LIMITED
REGISTERED OFFICE
DATE
NOTICE OF DISHONOUR & OPPORTUNITY TO CURE
NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT
Dear Robin Hoody,
Your company has failed to respond to the NOTICE REQUESTING ADEQUATE ASSURANCE OF DUR PERFORMANCE dated ______________________, and served by Royal Mail Recorded Delivery ############. Therefore, I hereby serve NOTICE OF DISHONOUR & OPPORTUNITY TO CURE. ROBIN HOODIES LIMITED has seven (7) days in which to deliver an appropriate response.
With sincerity and honour,
By: Upper-Case: Lower
Authorised Representative for STRAWMAN
All Rights Reserved – Without Prejudice – Without Recourse – Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted
_____________________________________________________________________
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
ROBIN HOODY (CEO)
ROBIN HOODIES LIMITED (DEBTOR)
REGISTERED OFFICE
DATE
NOTICE OF DISHONOUR
NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT
Dear Robin Hoody,
Your company has failed to respond to to the NOTICE OF FAULT & OPPORTUNITY TO CURE dated _______________________, and served by Royal Mail Recorded Delivery ############### on ______________________. Therefore, I hereby serve NOTICE OF DISHONOUR.
With sincerity and honour,
By: Upper-Case: Lower
Authorised Representative for STRAWMAN
All Rights Reserved – Without Prejudice – Without Recourse – Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted
_____________________________________________________________________
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
ROBIN HOODY (CEO)
ROBIN HOODIES LIMITED
REGISTERED OFFICE
DATE
NOTICE OF INTEREST
NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT
Dear Robin Hoody,
Pursuant to the clearly expressed terms of your company’s dishonour of NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE dated _______________________, NOTICE REQUESTING ADEQUATE ASSURANCE OF DUE PERFORMANCE dated ______________________, NOTICES OF DISHONOUR & OPPORTUNITY TO CURE dated ______________________ and ________________________ respectively, and the NOTICES OF DISHONOUR served on _____________________ and ___________________________, I hereby serve NOTICE OF INTEREST.
For the avoidance of doubt, STRAWMAN intends to file a commercial injury claim against ROBIN HOODIES LIMITED, currently valued at GBP£ 26,000.00 (TWENTY SIX THOUSAND GREAT BRITISH POUNDS STERLING).
The DEBTOR has seven (7) days from service of this notice to raise any issues, disputes or counterclaims pertaining to this matter.
With sincerity and honour,
By: Upper-Case: Lower
Authorised Representative for STRAWMAN
All Rights Reserved – Without Prejudice – Without Recourse – Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted
____________________________________________________________________
Affidavit of Obligation
Commercial Lien
A Verified Plain Statement of Fact
The Parties
Claimant:
Upper-case: Lower
Authorised Representative
STRAWMAN
MAILING LOCATION
Hereinafter known as “Lien Claimant”
Respondent:
Robin Hoody (CEO)
ROBIN HOODIES LIMITED
MAILING LOCATION
Hereinafter known as “Lien Debtor”
**The Laws of Commerce**
All are equal under the law. See Exodus 21:23-25; Lev. 24:17-21; Deut. 1:17, 19:21; Matt. 22:36-40; Luke 10:17; Col. 3:25. Legal maxims: No one is above the law; Commerce, by the law of nations, ought to be common, and not to be converted into a monopoly and the private gain of a few.
In commerce, truth is sovereign. See Exodus 20:16; Psalms 117:2; John 8:32; II Cor. 13:8. Legal maxim: To lie is to go against the mind.
Truth is expressed in the form of an Affidavit. See Lev. 5:4-5; Lev. 6:3-5; Lev. 19:11-13; Num. 30:2; Matt. 5:33; James 5:12.
An unrebutted affidavit stands as truth in commerce. See 1 Pet. 1:25; Heb. 6:13-15. Legal maxim: He, who does not deny, admits.
An unrebutted affidavit becomes a judgment in commerce. See Heb. 6:16-17. Any proceeding in court, tribunal or arbitration forum consists of a contest of commercial affidavits, wherein the points remaining unrebutted at the end of the contest stand as the truth to which the judgment of the law is applied.
He who leaves the field of battle first (does not respond appropriately to an Affidavit) loses by default. See Book of Job; Matt 10:22. Legal maxim: He who does not repel a wrong when he can occasions it.
Sacrifice is the measure of credibility. One who is not damaged, put at risk or willing to swear an oath or make an affirmation on his full commercial liability for the truth of his statements and the legitimacy of his actions, has no basis to assert claims or charges, and forfeits all credibility and right to claim the authority to do so. See Acts 7. Legal maxim: He who bears the burden ought also to derive the benefit.
A lien or claim, under commercial law, can only be satisfied by one of the following actions: A full rebuttal by an Affidavit of Truth, point-by-point, supported by evidence and sworn or affirmed at the same level of commercial risk; the satisfaction of the claimant, whether by payment or mutual agreement; resolution by a jury, in accordance with the rules of common law. See Gen. 2-3; Matt 4; Revelation. Legal maxim: If the plaintiff does not prove his case, the defendant is absolved
A party injured by the fraud of another may claim triple damages, plus the principal. “And Zacchaeus stood, and said unto the Lord: Behold, Lord, the half of my goods I give to the poor, and if I have taken any thing from any man by false accusation, I restore him fourfold.” Luke 19:8.
**Bouvier’s Maxims**
Contra veritatem lex numquam aliquid permittit. The law never suffers anything contrary to truth. 2 Co. Inst. 252. But sometimes it allows a conclusive presumption in opposition to truth. See 3 Bouv. Inst. n. 3061.
Contractus ex turpi causa, vel contra bonos mores nullus est. A contract founded on a base and unlawful consideration, or against good morals, is null. Hob. 167; Dig. 2, 14, 27, 4.
Culpa lata aequiparatur dolo. A concealed fault is equal to a deceit.
Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat. The burden of the proof lies upon him who affirms, not he who denies. Dig. 22, 3, 2; Tait on Ev. 1; 1 Phil. Ev. 194; 1 Greenl. Ev. Sec. 74; 3 Louis. R. 83; 2 Dan. Pr. 408; 4 Bouv Inst. n. 4411.
Error qui non resistitur, approbatur. An error not resisted is approved. Doct. & Stud. c. 70.
Ex dolo malo non oritur action. Out of fraud no action arises. Cowper, 343; Broom’s Max. 349.
Ex facto jus oritur. Law arises out of fact; that is, its application must be to facts.
Ex tota materia emergat resolutio. The construction or resolution should arise out of the whole subject matter.
Fraus est celare fraudem. It is a fraud to conceal a fraud. 1 Vern. 270.
Fraus latet in generalibus. Fraud lies hid in general expressions.
Idem est facere, et nolle prohibere cum possis. It is the same thing to do a thing as not to prohibit it when in your power. 3 Co. Inst. 178.
Incerta pro nullius habentur. Things uncertain are held for nothing. Dav. 33.
Incerta quantitas vitiat acium. An uncertain quantity vitiates the act. 1 Roll. R.
Invito beneficium non datur. No one is obliged to accept a benefit against his consent. Dig. 50, 17, 69. But if he does not dissent he will be considered as assenting. Vide Assent.
Judex damnatur cum nocens absolvitur. The judge is condemned when the guilty are acquitted.
Judicium non suo judice datum nullius est momenti. A judgment given by an improper judge is of no moment. 11 Co. 76.
Manga negligentia culpa est, magna culpa dolus est. Gross negligence is a fault, gross fault is a fraud. Dig 50, 16, 226.
Magna culpa dolus est. Great neglect is equivalent to fraud. Dig. 50, 16, 226; 2 Spears, R. 256; 1 Bouv. Inst. n. 646.
Peccatum peccato addit qui culpae quam facit patrocinium defensionis adjungit. He adds one offence to another, who, when he commits a crime, joins to it the protection of a defence. 5 Co. 49.
Quando do una et eadem re, duo onerabiles existunt, unus, pro insufficientia alterius, de integro onerabitur. When two persons are liable on a joint obligation, if one makes default the other must bear the whole. 2 Co. Inst. 277.
Qui non libere veritatem pronunciat, proditor est verilatis. He, who does not willingly speak the truth, is a betrayer of the truth.
Qui non obstat quod obstare potest facere videtur. He who does not prevent what he can seems to commit the thing. 2 Co. Inst. 146.
Qui non prohibit quod prohibere potest assentire videtur. He, who does not forbid what he can forbid, seems to assent. 2 Inst. 305.
Qui non propulsat injuriam quando potest, infert. He, who does not repel a wrong when he can, induces it. Jenk. Cent. 271.
Qui tacet consentire videtur. He who is silent appears to consent. Jenk. Cent. 32.
Reprobata pecunia liberat solventum. Money refused liberates the debtor. 9 Co. 79.
FRAUD ACT 2006
1 Fraud
(1) A person is guilty of fraud if he is in breach of any of the sections listed on subsection (2) (which provide for different ways of committing the offence).
(2) The sections are –
(a) section 2 (fraud by false representation),
(b) section 3 (fraud by failing to disclose information), and
(c) section 4 (fraud by abuse of position).
Private & International Law
UNIDROIT PRINCIPLES OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL CONTRACTS
Article 3.8 – Fraud
A party may avoid the contract when it has been led to conclude the contract by the other party’s fraudulent representation, including language, practices, or fraudulent nondisclosure of circumstances which, according to reasonable standards of fair dealing, the latter party should have disclosed.
Article 5.1.3 – Cooperation between the parties
Each party shall cooperate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party’s obligations.
Article 7.3.4 – Adequate Assurance of Due Performance
A party who reasonably believes that there will be a fundamental non-performance by the other party may meanwhile withhold its performance. Where this assurance is not provided within a reasonable time the party demanding it may terminate the contract.
Article 7.4.1 – Right to damages
Any non-performance gives the aggrieved party a right to damages either exclusively or in conjunction with any other remedies except where the non-performance is excused under these principles.
Article 7.4.2 – Full compensation
(1) The aggrieved party is entitled to full compensation for harm sustained as a result of the non-performance. Such harm includes both any loss which it suffered and any gain of which it was deprived, taking into account any gain to the aggrieved party resulting from its avoidance of cost or harm
(2) Such harm may be nonpecuniary and includes, for instance, physical suffering and emotional distress.
Allegations:
The following allegations arise from the conduct of Lien Debtor & the Agents of, indirectly and/or directly, in relation to an alleged agreement between the parties, having regard to ACCOUNT NUMBER ****************.
1. There is no evidence to suggest that a legally enforceable original agreement is in existence between the parties, and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.
2. There is no evidence to suggest that the allegedly outstanding balance AMOUNT ALLEGEDLY OWED on the above referenced account can be verified by Lien Debtor, and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.
3. There is no evidence to suggest that Lien Debtor’s valuable consideration pertaining to the alleged debt can be validated upon reasonable request by Lien Claimant, and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.
4. There is no evidence to suggest that Lien Debtor is not in multiple breaches of the Office of Fair Trading’s Final Guidance on Unfair Business Practices (updated December 2006).
5. There is no evidence to suggest that Lien Debtor, by its dishonour of Lien Claimant’s NOTICE REQUESTING ADEQUATE ASSURANCE OF DUE PERFORMANCE dated __________________ and NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE dated _______________________ , as well as NOTICES OF DISHONOUR & OPPORTUNITY TO CURE dated ________________________ and ______________________ respectively, is not concealing material facts pertaining to any existing and legally enforceable agreement between the parties, and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.
6. There is no evidence to suggest that Lien Debtor lent its own money as adequate consideration to purchase the note (loan agreement) from Lien Claimant, and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.
7. There is no evidence to suggest that Lien Claimant did not provide valuable consideration to fund the alleged loan(s) from Lien Debtor, and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.
8. There is no evidence to suggest that Lien Debtor did not accept an item of value from Lien Claimant that was used to give value to a cheque, electronic transfer or similar instrument, of approximately the same value of the alleged loan(s), and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.
9. There is no evidence to suggest that Lien Debtor followed UK GAAP (the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles of the United Kingdom) in the execution of the alleged loan(s), and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.
10. There is no evidence to suggest that Lien Debtor’s chartered accountant and auditor at the time of the alleged loan(s) can confirm that Lien Debtor followed UK GAAP in the execution of the alleged loan(s), and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.
11. There is no evidence to suggest that the intent of the alleged loan agreement is that the party who funded the loan(s) is not the party that is to be repaid the money, and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.
12. There is no evidence to suggest that all the material facts of the alleged loan(s) agreement have been disclosed to Lien Claimant, and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.
13. There is no evidence to suggest that Lien Claimant was obliged to lend the note to Lien Debtor or another financial institution, in order to fund the alleged loan(s), and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.
14. There is no evidence to suggest that the original agreement (purported mortgage note) has not been sold, altered or stolen, and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.
15. There is no evidence to suggest that the alleged borrower (Lien Claimant) did not provide the funds that the alleged lender (Lien Debtor) claims it lent to Lien Claimant, and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.
16. There is no evidence to suggest that Lien Debtor does not owe Lien Claimant a sum of money treble the value of Lien Debtor’s invalid claim, plus the alleged amount outstanding, and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.
17. There is no evidence to suggest that Lien Claimant has not already procured the tacit agreement of Lien Debtor that all of the allegations set forth in this Affidavit are factually correct, true and complete, and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.
Ledgering:
The value of this Commercial Lien is treble the value of Lien Debtor’s invalid claim of AMOUNT ALLEGEDLY OWED, plus the amount alleged to be outstanding by Lien Debtor.
TOTAL AMOUNT OWED BY LIEN DEBTOR IS £########.00
Surety:
Surety for the value of this Commercial Lien is ROBIN HOODIES LIMITED, including, without limitation, any and all of its property, products, proceeds, fittings and fixtures. If payment of TOTAL AMOUNT OWED is not received in full by Lien Claimant from Lien Debtor within the stipulated time, the public liability insurance policy of Lien Debtor will be claimed in order to satisfy any remaining value.
AFFIRMATION
I, Upper-Case: Lower, Authorised Representative for NAME OF PURPORTED MORTGAGOR (Lien Claimant), hereby affirm upon my own unlimited commercial liability and under penalty of perjury, that I have read all of the contents of pages 1-5 of this Affidavit of Obligation, and to the very best of my knowledge, I believe that the facts expressed herein are true, correct and complete.
__________________
Executed by: Upper-Case: Lower
Authorised Representative for STRAWMAN (Lien Claimant)
All Rights Reserved – Without Prejudice – Without Recourse – Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted
VERIFICATION
Affirmed, autographed and sealed before me, _________________, on the _______ day of the month of ________, in the year two thousand and ______.
Notary Public: Notary Seal:
Notary Public’s office location to receive responses
Signed & Sealed By: __________________________________________
NOTICE is hereby given that the Lien Debtor has seven (21) days after receipt of this Affidavit of Obligation to rebut, deny, or otherwise prove invalid the allegations contained herein. Failure to rebut, deny or otherwise disprove any of the allegations contained herein will be construed as Lien Debtors’ affirmation that said allegations have been proven to be true, correct and complete.
Void where prohibited by law.
______________________________________________________________________
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
ROBIN HOODY (CEO)
ROBIN HOODIES LIMITED (DEBTOR)
REGISTERED OFFICE
COMPANY NUMBER
LICENSE NUMBER
DATE
NOTICE OF FAULT & OPPORTUNITY TO CURE
NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT
Dear Robin Hoody,
Your company has failed to respond to to the AFFIDAVIT OF OBLIGATION dated _______________________, and served by Royal Mail Recorded Delivery ############### on ______________________. Therefore, I hereby serve NOTICE OF FAULT & OPPORTUNITY TO CURE. ROBIN HOODIES LIMITED has seven (7) days in which to deliver an appropriate and timely response to the Notary’s office.
With sincerity and honour,
By: Upper-Case: Lower
Authorised Representative for STRAWMAN
All Rights Reserved – Without Prejudice – Without Recourse – Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted
______________________________________________________________________
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
ROBIN HOODY (CEO)
ROBIN HOODIES LIMITED (DEBTOR)
REGISTERED OFFICE
COMPANY NUMBER
LICENSE NUMBER
DATE
NOTICE OF DEFAULT
NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT
Dear Robin Hoody,
Your company has failed to respond to to the notarised AFFIDAVIT OF OBLIGATION dated _______________________, and served by Royal Mail Recorded Delivery ############### on ______________________, as well as NOTICE OF FAULT & OPPORTUNITY TO CURE dated _______________________, and served by Royal Mail Recorded Delivery ############### on ______________________.
Therefore, I hereby serve NOTICE OF DEFAULT.
With sincerity and honour,
By: Upper-Case: Lower
Authorised Representative for STRAWMAN
All Rights Reserved – Without Prejudice – Without Recourse – Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted
______________________________________________________________________
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE & NON-RESPONSE
A Verified Plain Statement of the Facts
I, Upper-Case: Lower, an adult flesh and blood man of sound mind, do state unequivocally that I served the following documents on ROBIN HOODY, CEO of ROBIN HOODIES LIMITED (Respondent), by Royal Mail Recorded Delivery:
1. NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE DATED ______________________, ROYAL MAIL RECORDED DELIVERY #################;
2. NOTICE OF DISHONOUR & OPPORTUNITY TO CURE DATED ______________________, ROYAL MAIL RECORDED DELIVERY #################;
3. NOTICE OF DISHONOUR DATED DATED ______________________, ROYAL MAIL RECORDED DELIVERY #################;
4. NOTICE SEEKING ADEQUATE ASSURANCE OF DUE PERFORMANCE DATED ____________ _______, ROYAL MAIL RECORDED DELIVERY #################;
5. NOTICE OF DISHONOUR & OPPORTUNITY TO CURE DATED ______________________, ROYAL MAIL RECORDED DELIVERY #################;
6. NOTICE OF DISHONOUR DATED ______________________, ROYAL MAIL RECORDED DELIVERY #################;
7. NOTICE OF LIEN INTEREST DATED ______________________, ROYAL MAIL RECORDED DELIVERY #################;
8. AFFIDAVIT OF OBLIGATION DATED ______________________, ROYAL MAIL RECORDED DELIVERY #################;
9. NOTICE OF FAULT & OPPORTUNITY TO CURE DATED ______________________, ROYAL MAIL RECORDED DELIVERY #################;
10. NOTICE OF DEFAULT DATED DATED ______________________, ROYAL MAIL RECORDED DELIVERY #################.
The Respondent has subsequently failed to deliver appropriate and timely responses to any of the documents listed above.
AFFIRMATION
I hereby affirm and declare upon my own unlimited commercial liability and under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true, complete and correct, and not misleading.
By: Upper-Case: Lower________________________________
Authorised Representative for STRAWMAN (Lien Claimant)
All Rights Reserved – Without Recourse – Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted
VERIFICATION
Affirmed, autographed and sealed before me, _________________, on the _______ day of the month of ________, in the year two thousand and ______.
NAME & ADDRESS OF NOTARY PUBLIC Seal:
Signed: _______________________________
NOTICE is hereby given that the Respondent has three (3) days after receipt of this Affidavit of Service to rebut, deny, or otherwise prove invalid the statement of the facts contained herein. Failure to deliver an appropriate response to the Notary Public’s office within the stated time will comprise the tacit procuration of the Respondent’s agreement that the contents of this Affidavit are true, correct and complete, and not misleading.
Notary Public Name & Office Address
_____________________________________________________________________
CERTIFICATE OF NON-RESPONSE
Notice to agent is notice to principal
Notice to principal is notice to agent
To the best of my knowledge, on ______________ , ROBIN HOODY, CEO of ROBIN HOODIES LIMITED (RESPONDENT), was sent an “AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE & NON-RESPONSE” by Royal Mail Special Delivery ###############. My records show that no response has been forthcoming from RESPONDENT or any of its principals, agents and the like, thereby comprising the tacit procuration of RESPONDENT’S agreement that none of the facts contained therein are in dispute.
Therefore, pursuant to RESPONDENT’S failure to rebut the claims made in the “AFFIDAVIT OF OBLIGATION” DATED ______________________, and sent by ROYAL MAIL RECORDED DELIVERY #################, the allegations contained therein are sustained on the grounds that RESPONDENT had a duty to respond and elected not to.
This CERTIFICATE OF NON-RESPONSE reflects the verity that I have first hand knowledge of the facts pertaining to this matter; to wit, that RESPONDENT failed to respond to both the “AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE & NON-RESPONSE” and the “AFFIDAVIT OF OBLIGATION”, thereby affirming the facts and/or allegations contained therein.
Wherefore, I now witness this CERTIFICATE OF NON-RESPONSE.
NAME & ADDRESS OF NOTARY PUBLIC Seal:
Signed: _______________________________
Use of a Notary Public is for attestation and verification purposes only and does not constitute a change in the true nature, character and standing of Claimant. This document may be used in a Judicial Proceeding.
[bitmate-author-donate]
Where is the commentary to this? I wish to dispute my mortgage. Thanks
A coruscating shockumentary film called The Great British Mortgage Swindle can now be streamed on Vimeo at the link below:
https://vimeo.com/ondemand/tgbms
I strongly suspect it contains the the “commentary” you are seeking on the nature of institutionalised mortgage fraud and how it can be challenged, both in and out of court.